After failing to score for the fifth game running, pundits, journalists and fans alike are trying to pinpoint why Daniel Sturridge is struggling to recapture the form he displayed in 2013/2014 season, which saw him form a devastating attacking trident with Raheem Stirling and Luis Suarez. During that season, Sturridge scored 21 Premier league goals […]
After failing to score for the fifth game running, pundits, journalists and fans alike are trying to pinpoint why Daniel Sturridge is struggling to recapture the form he displayed in 2013/2014 season, which saw him form a devastating attacking trident with Raheem Stirling and Luis Suarez. During that season, Sturridge scored 21 Premier league goals as Liverpool narrowly missed out on the title to Manchester City. On the back of this stunning season, he was widely regarded as one of the most dangerous strikers in Europe. Fast forward three years and a completely different picture is painted. Having had to contend with two injury hit seasons, Sturridge for the most part, has managed to stay fit this campaign. However, his performances have been somewhat underwhelming, with several quarters questioning his work ethic and adaptability, Sturridge has found himself in and out of Jürgen Klopp’s high pressing free flowing Liverpool side. Still only 27, why has a player who seemed to have the world at his feet stagnated so badly?
One possible explanation is that Daniel Sturridge has lost the electric pace which made him such a dangerous player. This has been supported by a recent article published by Sky Sports, which showed a sharp decline in Daniels Sturridge top sprint speed since the 2013/2014 season. Interestingly, Jamie Carragher picked up on the idea that Sturridge may be worried about getting injured again: “I don’t know if his pace has completely gone or whether he’s that worried with injuries that he pulls out of something”. Despite this comment from Jamie Carragher seemingly addressing a psychological explanation of injury, little is understood about the psychological consequences of injury, despite research identifying athletes returning to sport to experience; feelings of isolation, lack of athletic identity, lack of confidence and trust and increased anxiety (Podlog, Dimmock & Miller, 2011; Podlog & Eklund, 2007; Walker, Thatcher, Lavallee & Golby, 2004).
A common theme with Sturridge’s injury history is that he has often picked up a different injury after just returning to full fitness. Since the 2013/2014 season, Sturridge has suffered eight separate injuries (hip, leg, calf, foot, thigh, hamstring, knee, ankle ligaments). Whilst there are several physiological explanations for his re-injury, an alternative explanation can come from the psychology of injury, notably in the form of re-injury anxiety (Heil, 1993). According to research, re- injury anxiety concerns begin to exist once an athlete gets closer to returning to sport (Udry,Gould, Bridges & Beck, 1997). This anxiety leads to an athlete experiencing a sense of apprehension about putting themselves in a similar situation to the one that caused the original injury (Podlog & Eklund, 2006), with athletes who have high levels of anxiety likely suffer another injury (Bianco, 2001). The idea of an athlete being apprehensive could explain Sturridge’s decline in maximum sprint speed over the last few years because of previous experience. This therefore could lead to him being reluctant forcibly exert himself during a game and put himself in a situation which led to the original injury (Heil, 1993).
One criticism aimed at Sturridge is that he is not a ‘team player’ and does not offer the work rate required to fit into a Klopp team. Whilst this may be partly true, Sturridge has previously formed an interchangeable front three during the 2013/2014 season where he was more willing to be a team player. Injuries have inevitably not helped his willingness to be a team player, with his appearances being restricted to starting only 28 % of all games in the last three seasons. One problem Sturridge may be facing is the impact injuries have had on his inability to reach pre-injury standards, as he has been unable to perform his skills for a prolonged period (Podlog & Eklund, 2007). The lack of a consistent run of games over the last two seasons, may have led Sturridge to unconsciously adapt his game to stop the occurrence of injuries. This is supported by a longitudinal investigation examining NFL players, who experienced a decrease in performance after returning from injury. Notably, running backs and wide receivers exhibited a 33% drop in rushing and receiving yards as well as touch downs (Carey, Huffman, Parekh & Sennett, 2006). The researchers noted that upon the return the athletes had decreased confidence and trust in their bodies, which explained their reduced performance levels. In relation to Sturridge, his reluctance to be a team player may simply come down to his unwillingness to put his body through too much strain which has inevitably reduced his performance levels and team performance.
A final explanation stems from pressure on Sturridge to return to football early (Bauman, 2005). During the first few weeks of his reign, Klopp openly questioned Sturridge’s ability to distinguish between pain and real pain, urging the striker to distinguish between the two. This, accompanied by a media fanfare surrounding his chequered injury history has created a pressurised environment for Daniel Sturridge to return from injury early. Whilst coaches will usually assess if a player is physically ready, little is understood as to whether a player is mentally ready to return to action (Murphy & Waddington, 2007). According to Bauman (2005), elite athletes are under increasing pressure to make a quick return from injury. In Sturridge’s case, he was often portrayed as the man who could save Liverpool and England. This pressure could have led to Sturridge feeling guilty and returning from injury when he was not physically and psychologically ready to do so, which ultimately led to him picking up another injury shortly after returning to the team (Podlog & Eklund, 2005). This can further validate why his sprint performance has decreased over the last four years.
Whilst psychological factors play an undoubted role, this article is not denouncing physiological and biomechanical explanations for his injury history and reduced sprint speed, with researchers identifying the importance to account for the many factors which influence a player’s poor injury history (Podlog & Eklund, 2004). At the time of writing, Daniel Sturridge has not scored in his last five games with many media outlets touting him for a move away from Liverpool. Whilst he has received widespread criticism, he has played more games at this stage than in the previous two seasons, having seemingly overcome his injury problems, for now at least. The next year represents a critical point in his career, as he aims to shake off his injury problems for good and recapture the form which made him one of Europe’s deadliest strikers.
Sport Psychology is a growing discipline and one that I find myself privileged to be involved in. Despite this growth, I still wonder why it can often be viewed as a last resort for some. This was highlighted in a recent article on Laura Robson utilising Sport Psychology services to ‘revive’ her tennis career. This […]
Sport Psychology is a growing discipline and one that I find myself privileged to be involved in. Despite this growth, I still wonder why it can often be viewed as a last resort for some. This was highlighted in a recent article on Laura Robson utilising Sport Psychology services to ‘revive’ her tennis career.
This bought me back to a sticking point that I frequently encounter, how can we encourage sport organisations and athletes to utilise Sport Psychology support on all levels before we hit a ‘crisis’ point and cling to the hope of it getting athletes out of trouble. Very rarely have I been approached by an athlete who says everything is going well, I want to ensure I have all the tools to maintain that success.
The article states that Robson does not lack talent but the mental side of her game often appears fragile. Could she have learnt valuable mental skills at a younger age to build upon and help her prepare for a career at the top level of her game? It also discusses the issue she has around double faults and having to repeat her throw up. If this is so commonly related to nerves could we arm young players with the strategies to understand their nerves and still perform effectively?
There is still an element of doubt and lack of commitment to Sport Psychology programmes in some environments. But, if athletes are reaching a stage in their career where they are ‘trying everything’ to rescue their chances, should we encourage a more structured process for young athletes so they have already explored the options available and understand what works for them.
I am yet to come across a sport organisation or athlete that does not understand the combination of technical, tactical, physical, nutritional and psychological elements that are required to compete at the top level in any sport. The struggle lies within the balance of time and understanding that is given to each area throughout the sporting career.
My purpose in writing this is not to direct every athlete towards regular contact with a sport psychologist, but to ensure that we all take time to contemplate what we could gain from understanding the mental side of our game in relation to performance and well-being. This may involve a discussion with your coach, fellow team mates or family about the positives of your performances or aspects you want to improve. Some may want to explore professional assistance to develop deeper level mental skills for performance or discuss how non-sport commitments impact your performances in a positive or negative way.
The well know phrase, ‘prevention is better than cure’ sums up how Sport Psychology is currently utilised in some environments. I’m not saying that Sport Psychologists cannot work after numerous setbacks or struggles to help athletes succeed. But, are there more effective ways to utilise the skill-set when things are going well and as a development tool for younger athletes.
Which is more effective –
Sessions to develop skills to help you understand when things are going well or not so well and how ‘you’ can do something to change or maintain it?
Sessions to unpick the difficulties you are having, followed by a process to build yourself back up?
My answer – Both have their place, but is prevention better than cure?
There has been a recent increase in the discussion of Sport Psychologists becoming embedded in sport environments and working closer with the team of support staff over several months and years to create an environment where the mental side of the game is on a par with other sport science disciplines. National Governing Bodies are utilising the support at the top end of their sports with multi-disciplinary teams. However, can we reduce the stigma of Sport Psychology, help younger athletes understand their ‘mental game’, and create environments where Sport Psychology is the ‘norm’, in the same way as pitch and gym sessions, are an integral part of competitive sport.
Coaching styles and coaching strategies are terms typically thrown around in academia, the media, and sport. For the purpose of this read, I will refer to a coaching style as a concrete, well established framework from which to base a game-plan. A coaching strategy however, will be referred to a coach’s adaptation style and how […]
Coaching styles and coaching strategies are terms typically thrown around in academia, the media, and sport. For the purpose of this read, I will refer to a coaching style as a concrete, well established framework from which to base a game-plan. A coaching strategy however, will be referred to a coach’s adaptation style and how he or she applies it to the situation, given unforeseen elements. Let’s look at an example:
A track coach whom specializes in sprints is given the task of coaching mid-distance runners at a large track and field event. The meet is expected run in large heats, but each of his athletes are running in the same heat of roughly 20 individuals. The coach, experienced in sprint style training, decides to put the slower and larger runners up front as ‘rabbits’ or pacers. The purpose is to hide his faster runners behind the ‘rabbits’ for the final 200 meters in the race. Once the last 200m arrives, the larger runners will open a ‘gap’ of which the smaller, faster runners can break out of while the larger runners become ‘blockers’.
In this situation, the coaching style is sprints; the situation is a distance event; the elements would be the large amount of people within the heat; and the strategy would be the ‘rabbit/blocking’ technique. So why do we care? Researchers in psychology have discovered that specific coaching strategies and styles have the potential to both directly and indirectly affect sport performance (Amorose & Anderson-Butcher, 2007; Macquet, Ferrand, & Stanton, 2015).
One strategy of coaching that is clearly seen throughout competition is known as planning. Planning is an integral part of each coaches’ ability to approach new challenges. Planning involves the prioritization of duties, observation of behavioral cues, evaluation of action efficiency and assessments of past performances. Through planning, coaches have the ability to directly reduce the time it takes for their athletes to recover both mentally and physically (Macquet et al., 2015).
Another important aspect of coaching which has been empirically researched and supported is the notion of message delivery. The manner in which coaches address their athletes has shown to directly and indirectly impact an athletes’ sense of autonomy, relatedness, and competence (Mellinger & Cheek, 2014). The strength of these components, in turn, have the potential to influence overall motivation in sport-related activity (Amorose & Anderson-Butcher, 2007). Researchers have termed this idea as: Self-Determination Theory (SDT).
This theory suggests that greater motivation will create greater a sense of positivity and performance as a result (Ntoumanis, 2001). With this in mind, when coaches plan their strategies and apply their styles, it is important to remember that the overall goal is to create a positive environment from which to increase motivation and enhance overall athletic performance. So, what does all of this mean? As previously noted, there are a multitude of coaching styles. Furthermore, there are endless ways to design and enhance applied strategies. The most effective styles of coaching, according to Self-Determination Theory are those that establish a greater sense of autonomy, relatedness, and competence within the athletes’ minds.
Let’s review the original example. A sprint coach was given a task to win a mid-distance race. Utilizing his experiences in an alternative specialization, he established a clear and concise strategy based on the strengths of his athletes (relatedness) and what has been personally successful in the past. This strategy works based on trust and how well the athletes can execute it (autonomy). Therefore, individual experience and understanding of an alternative strategy will have a major impact on the overall success of the team (competence). This collective unit approach summarizes everything SDT needs to be successful.
Properly educating coaches on sport psychological theories such as SDT, have the potential to enhance both the styles and strategies coaches need to be successful. Overall, coaches will always be seeking new and innovative ways to gain an edge over their opponents. Continuing education appears to be an easy, and potentially cost effective way, to start.
Sleep is an integral part of what makes humans function (Harris et al., 2015). It is a common need that, if neglected, has the potential to negatively impact our daily performance (Wickens, Hutchins, Laux, & Sebok, 2015). Researchers from numerous organizations and universities have attempted to determine exactly how much sleep is needed. While the […]
Sleep is an integral part of what makes humans function (Harris et al., 2015). It is a common need that, if neglected, has the potential to negatively impact our daily performance (Wickens, Hutchins, Laux, & Sebok, 2015). Researchers from numerous organizations and universities have attempted to determine exactly how much sleep is needed. While the empirical evidence supports optimal performance after 7.5 to 8 hours of sleep, performance varies across different individuals. As a result, researchers are left to give general recommendations rather than definitive statements and give the general public information on what sleep is and what sleep can do for performance. For the purpose of this article, the methods of how sleep is being researched will be discussed with reference to two key factors of sleep: 1) quantity and 2) quality.
Sleep quantity is another way of describing how much sleep an individual gets over a period of time. Currently, researchers suggest that individual’s need between 7.5 and 8 hours a sleep each night (Harris et al., 2015). Researchers assessing sleep quantity conduct their examination utilizing many techniques including, but not limited to: observational methods, longitudinal routine studies, and simple/complex task based activities. When cross analyzing each of these techniques, a negative correlation can be observed between hours of prolonged ‘awakeness’ and performance. While results are unique to each participant, cluster sampling revealed the majority of participants’ optimal performance occured within a 7.5 to 8-hour sleep quantity (Harris et al., 2015).
External influences such as conditioning, supplements, diet, and lifestyle may be a major influence on performance and a reason why there are large disparities across multiple studies. A potential way to account for these disparities is through strictly controlled studies taking into account the external influences previously noted.
Sleep quality is a self-reported measure of how ‘well’ one has slept (Harris et al., 2015). A common method to assess sleep quality is through a Likert scale. As previously discussed with sleep quantity, sleep quality has external influences as well. As with many self-reported measures, results are largely based on individual perception rather than definitive reactive observations (e.g., fMRI, fcMRI). While self-report measures are difficult to draw concrete conclusions from, it is not to say that they aren’t a valuable research tool. Properly educating the general public through proper ways of self-reporting could play a major role on the validity and reliability of longitudinal data.
Research surrounding sleep is both complex and valuable. Sleep is a major influence regarding how an individual performs daily tasks. Sleep detriment has a negative impact over time. In other words, the more time that passes while an individual is awake, the less likely they are to perform optimally (Wickens et al., 2015). The detriment resulting from sleep deprivation is what researchers call compounded. In simplistic terms, one night of 12 hours of sleep will not make up for the 4 hours of sleep gathered the previous week. Performance will continuously be influenced, either positively or negatively, through both sleep quantity and sleep quality (Harris et al., 2015).
In summary, sleep is important. The absence of sleep quality and quantity have shown to directly impact performance. The 7.5 to 8-hour sleep recommendation has both empirical and observational support and should be taken under consideration for individuals interested in optimal performance levels. Compounded sleep loss and loss of performance become more evident as time awake progresses. In the end, sleep quantity is self-determined. Sleep quality, however, has a place for future studies and should be a primary focus for performance related research.
As the greatest show on earth – The Olympic Games – grips our attention once more, there is an increased focus on the way in which women are portrayed in the media. But what influence could the media portrayal of women have upon female participation in sport and exercise? This article will explore past research […]
As the greatest show on earth – The Olympic Games – grips our attention once more, there is an increased focus on the way in which women are portrayed in the media. But what influence could the media portrayal of women have upon female participation in sport and exercise? This article will explore past research alongside my dissertation findings.
Research shows that the media has the power to shape public beliefs and values. How the public view themselves, and are viewed by others can be greatly determined by their media representation (Kane 1988; Dyer 1993). My study investigated the way in which the media portrays women, and its potential influence on female participation in sport and exercise, by conducting a focus group on women who reported regularly engaging in exercise, physical activity or sport.
Higgs, Weiller & Martin (2003) suggest that sports media can influence how people view sports participation, and that certain aspects of female sport are emphasised while other aspects are ignored. This effectively manipulates how spectators view women’s sport, and influences public opinion regarding athletes. In particular there is often a focus on women’s sex appeal and femininity rather than their athletic accomplishments (Bissel & Duke 2007). My findings support the ability of the media to pressure women into looking a certain way by publishing unrealistic images. As a result, self-objectification and psychological issues such as low self-esteem can plague the female audience.
Therefore, despite an ever-increasing view that sport is an appropriate pastime for women, perhaps an underlying message asserts that whilst competing, women must still conform to society’s view of femininity (Higgs, Weiller & Martin 2003). Furthermore, manipulative media techniques may be found to influence female sport participation levels by portraying which sports are deemed gender appropriate. Trolan (2013) supports this by suggesting that female athletes who conform to the traditional ideas of femininity receive greater benefits than those who do not conform to societal norms. As an example, Anna Kournikova, despite never winning a major tennis tournament is worth more than any other tennis player past or present, due to endorsements based on her appearance rather than athletic skill.
Consequently, the lack of focus on health and fitness was also suggested as a demotivating factor in terms of women’s participation in sport and exercise. Participants particularly disliked the use of women’s bodies to sell products in a sexual manner. It was suggested that media of this nature would fail to engage with women by neglecting to exhibit their athletic abilities. Participants also highlighted that many females engage in sport and exercise in a non-sexualised manner and thus it is not necessary to sexualise physical activity to encourage participation. This promotes the view that the media portray an unrealistic view of women and thus contribute to a feeling of misunderstanding between women and the media. This may have implications for not only women in sport, but in their daily lives.
Contrastingly, alongside previous research, my findings suggested that media with an instrumental focus (which focuses upon athletic skill) has the potential to influence sport and exercise participation (Daniels 2009; Daniels 2012). By promoting athleticism and the instrumental value of the female body, the capabilities of women within sport and exercise can be demonstrated, and women can be inspired to consider their own bodies instrumentally.
Images with an instrumental focus have also been found to result in less self-objectification and pressure upon women than sexualised images (Fallon & Hausenblas 2005). Further, the demonstration of athleticism and health may encourage women to participate in physical activity to improve their own fitness levels without the pressure to conform to society’s unrealistic standards of physical appearance. These findings are consistent with Daniels’ (2012) proposal that images with an instrumental focus invoked admiration for athletes’ accomplishments, solidarity with other women and the athletes were also considered to be role models. Consequently, media is able to have a positive influence upon sport and exercise participation in women when emphasis is placed upon improving health and wellbeing.
My findings suggested that a more realistic portrayal of women within the media by portraying a diverse range of women may serve to combat the issue of intimidation felt by women who may compare themselves with the models within sports campaigns. The realistic portrayal of women and female athletes could demonstrate the journey towards health and fitness and not only display the benefits of sport and exercise, but also the challenges. This may create more inclusive media campaigns that encourage and inspire women to participate in sport and exercise, contributing positively to psychological wellbeing and therefore the psychological state of the general public.
To conclude, the media can significantly influence female participation rates in physical activity. Research continues to highlight the negative influence that sexualised sports media can have on women both psychologically and physiologically. However, performance images with an instrumental focus regarding the female body can serve to motivate women and encourage confidence, health and wellbeing through sport and exercise. Furthermore, action must be taken to encourage positive media which emphasises female athletes’ physical capabilities and triumphs in order to promote physical activity for all and champion our female athletes.
The current UK guidelines suggest that adults should accumulate 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity across the week (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE}, 2012). Despite evidence of the positive health benefits, a paradox exists where exercise may produce negative effects such as depression and anxiety (Szabo, 1998). A dependence on exercise […]
The current UK guidelines suggest that adults should accumulate 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity across the week (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE}, 2012). Despite evidence of the positive health benefits, a paradox exists where exercise may produce negative effects such as depression and anxiety (Szabo, 1998). A dependence on exercise is often cited as a symptom of an underlying eating disorder, such as anorexia nervosa (Yates, Leehey & Shisslak, 1983) conditions all of which are recognised by the DSM-V. This has raised a debate about whether the dependence on exercise can occur without another underlying psychological disorder being present.
Positive and Negative Dependence
Research examining the negative consequences of physical activity has mainly focused on exercise dependence (Hausenblas & Symons Downs, 2002a). The term was first used to describe over-commitment to exercise in middle-aged men who continued to exercise despite suffering injuries from involvement (Little, 1969). Baekeland (1970) suggested that exercise dependence can have either a positive or negative nature. It was first described as a ‘positive’ addiction because it was thought to produce both psychological and physiological benefits such as feelings of euphoria, increased mental strength and could lead to self-transcendence (Glasser, 1976). By contrast, a negative addiction reflects the withdrawal symptoms of agitation, anxiety and depression (Szabo, 1998) experienced by exercisers when they are denied access to exercise opportunities (Allegre, Souville, Therme & Griffiths, 2006).
Negative dependence on exercise was researched by Morgan (1979). Dependence was present if the individual required daily exercise in order to exist or cope and if deprived of exercise, the individual would manifest withdrawal symptoms (such as depression, anxiety or irritability) Morgan argued that these withdrawal symptoms were no different to the chemical-dependence process seen for other drug and substance abuses. Symptoms of negative dependence include: an increased in dose dependence with exercise, an increase in withdrawal symptoms (including depression, anxiety, irritability, muscle tension and decreased appetite) and putting exercise as a high priority (Morgan, 1979). In 1985, Dishman coined the term obligatory exercise which described people who have an unhealthy need to exercise. This included the three symptoms of negative dependence described by Morgan.
Classification in the ICD and DSM
Goodman (1998) argues that addictions are distinguished from impulsive and compulsive behaviour by their dual capacity to reduce negative affect and create a positive mood. The ICD-10 doesn’t classify exercise dependence as an individual disorder, but rather as: symptoms of compulsion (a desire/compulsion to take the substance); impaired control (difficulty in controlling behaviour regarding the substance); withdrawal (occurring once the substance has been withdrawn); relief use (substance is used to avoid or relieve symptoms of withdrawal); tolerance (increased amount of substance required to achieve the desired effect) and salience (increase in the amount of time taking, obtaining and recovering from the effects of the substance).
By contrast, within the DSM-V, exercise dependence is not classified as a standalone disorder but rather as a symptom of another such as anorexia nervosa (APA, 2013). Despite this, Hausenblas and Symons Down (2002b) used the DSM-IV criteria for substance abuse to demonstrate the plausibility of individuals fulfilling the criteria of this disorder. These include: tolerance (need for an increase in exercise); withdrawal (anxiety or fatigue); intention effect (more exercise is undertaken then was intended); lack of control (a desire or unsuccessful effort to cut down or control exercise); time (spent on activities needed to obtain exercise); reduction of other activities (such as social or occupational) and continuance (exercise is continued despite the knowledge of an injury or psychological problem).
Currently, within the sport and exercise psychology literature, the Hausenblas and Symons Down (2002a) definition is utilised. However, the debate still continues as to whether it can ever be viewed as a primary or secondary phenomena. Indeed, revisions of the DSM made to version 5 saw the introduction of gambling disorder which reflects the evidence that some behaviour activated the brain reward system with effects similar to those of drug abuse (APA, 2013). This lack of recognition of exercise as a form of substance abuse further illustrates the divergent opinions on the origins of dependence on exercise.
Primary and Secondary Dependence
As described above, exercise dependence can be split into two elements namely: primary dependence and secondary dependence. Primacy dependence is defined as meeting the criteria for exercise dependence and continually exercising solely for the psychological gratification resulting from the exercise behaviour its self (Bamber, Cockerill & Carroll, 2003). Secondary exercise dependence is defined as meeting the criteria for exercise dependence but using excessive exercise to accomplish some other end (e.g. weight loss) that is related to another disorder, such as an eating disorder (Bamber et al., 2003). Secondary exercise dependence is secondary to a more severe psychopathy and presents more severe consequences such as earlier eating disorder onset, lower BMI, more eating disorder symptoms and higher anxiety (Dalle, Grave, Calugi, & Marchesini, 2008).
Who is susceptible?
There has been research carried out to try and identify who (if anyone) is susceptible to developing exercise dependence. Research suggests that the number of people suffering from exercise dependence ranges from 2-3% (Symos Down, Hausenblas & Nigg, 2004; Griffiths, Szabo & Terry, 2005) to 20-30% (Zmijewski & Howard, 2003; Anderson, Basson & Geils, 1997). Research also suggests that between 15-20% of people with exercise dependence are also addicted to nicotine, alcohol or drugs (Aidman & Wollard, 2003) and it is also common within individuals who are addicted to sex and have buying addiction (Lejoyeux, Avril, Richoux, Embouazza & Nivoli, 2008; Carnes, Murray & Charpentier, 2005). Endurance sports such as running, swimming and triathlons are believed to attract or develop people with an addiction to exercise (Chapman & DeCastro, 1990; Kerr, 1997; Pierce, McGowan & Lynn, 1993; Veale, 1985).
Exercise Dependence and Eating Disorders
It has been suggested that 39-48% of people who suffer from an eating disorder also suffer from exercise dependence (Hausenblas & Downs, 2002a; Klein, Bennett, Schebendach, Foltin, Devlin & Walsh, 2004; Bamber, Cockerill, Rogers & Carroll, 2000). As discussed earlier, this idea of exercise dependence in line with an underlying psychological disorder is referred to as secondary dependence. There is strong empirical evidence that links eating disorders to secondary exercise dependence (Blaydon & Lindner, 2002). With this in mind, Bamber, Cockerill and Carroll (2000) argue that in the absence of an eating disorder, those who identify as exercise dependent do not exhibit the level of psychological distress that warrant primary exercise dependence as a widespread pathology. Eating disorders serve as an ineffective coping strategy to cope with emotional regulation, with exercise also serving as a similar regulatory function (Lawson, Baron-Cohen, & Wheelwright, 2004).
The characteristics of exercise dependence are common among eating disorder patients (Touyz, Beumont, Hook, 1987). 28% of eating disorder patients described themselves as compulsive exercisers (Brewerton, Stellefson, Hibbs, & Hodges, & Cochrane 1995) while another study found that 93% of eating disorder patients felt their need to be active was out of control (Davis, Kennedy, Ralevski, & Dionne 1994). Bamber et al, (2000) state that if exercise dependence is pathological, sufferers should display clear evidence of psychological issues, at a similar level for other behavioural pathologies. In a study for pathological gamblers, 60% had a lifetime mood disorder, 40% a lifetime anxiety disorder and 87% a personality disorder (Black & Moyer, 1998). Similarly, 60% of heroin addicts have been found to have an anxiety disorder and 41% have a depressive illness (Darke & Ross, 1997). There is little information on psychological disturbances and distress as general characteristics of exercise dependence (Bamber et al., 2000) suggesting that exercise dependence is a secondary disorder to another disorder, such as an eating disorder.
Within the exercise dependence and eating disorder literature, the primary focus is with exercise dependence and anorexia nervosa (Veale, 1987). There is a strong similarity between obligatory runners and anorexic patients (Yates et al., 1983). Yates et al, (1983) argued that male obligatory runners resembled anorexia nervosa patients on personality traits such as introversion, inhibition of anger, high expectations, depression and excessive use of denial and as such they could be viewed as ‘sister activities.’ Exercise behaviour is also reinforcing to individuals who suffer with anorexia nervosa (Klein et al., 2004).
There is also evidence to suggest that exercise dependence is linked to muscle dysmorphic disorder in experienced bodybuilders and strength athletes (Hurst, Hale, Smith & Collins, 2000). Muscle dysmorphia is a condition that can be characterised by individuals having a distorted body image including gaining muscle size and definition and a fear of being perceived as weak or thin (Hurst et al., 2000). An exploratory study predicted that some individuals start bodybuilding because they suffer from poor self-esteem and become dependent on the training to feel good about their body (Smith, Hale & Collins, 1998). Although, as this was only an exploration, more research would need to be conducted before this relationship can really be determined.
It is clear that exercise dependence does in some form exist. However, in order for those suffering to get access to the treatment they need, than it should be included as a primary disorder and not just treated alongside a secondary eating disorder. Although more research is being done into the area, better methods of testing should also be developed before this area is fully understood.
It doesn’t seem that long since the London 2012 Olympic Games were gracing our TV screens in the Summer that saw Great Britain achieve 29 Olympic Gold medals across 26 sports. Fast forward to the present and we are edging ever so closer to another sport filled Summer, with the 2016 Olympic Games being held […]
It doesn’t seem that long since the London 2012 Olympic Games were gracing our TV screens in the Summer that saw Great Britain achieve 29 Olympic Gold medals across 26 sports. Fast forward to the present and we are edging ever so closer to another sport filled Summer, with the 2016 Olympic Games being held in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. With average temperatures at that time of the year approximately 24 degrees celsius and a 50% chance of a cloudy day, the weather conditions have potential to be close to perfect, or at least better than the UK.
There are a whole host of things that can play upon the performance of an athlete; the weather, travelling, diet, sleep, training and physical ability. One of the most important aspects of sporting performance, regardless of the type of sport, is the mental mind set of the athlete. The physical performance of an athlete can only take them so far; everyone at the Olympics trains hard, eats right, gets the right amount of sleep, and what sets an athlete apart from the rest is their mental game.
An athlete’s mental game comes in the form of mental toughness. A mentally tough performer can be thought of as an individual who makes fewer mistakes, who doesn’t deny the problem but is efficient with their response, and who does not dwell on defeat but accepts its inevitability graciously at some point in their career (Sheard, 2012).
“Every practise and competition begins with the way you think. The quality of your thoughts is critical; think in ways that promote the outcomes that you desire”
Across many sports athletes often attribute their success to mental toughness, but what exactly is mental toughness and how is it defined?
Unfortunately there are many different definitions of mental toughness in literature including: an ability to cope with pressure, stress and adversity (Goldberg, 1998), an ability to overcome or rebound from failures (Dennis, 1981), and the possession of superior mental skills (Bull, Albinson & Shambrook, 1996). There are also many characteristics of mentally tough athletes as proposed in literature, such as high levels of optimism, confidence, self belief, determination and concentration (Loehr, 1982). Despite the general lack of clarity surrounding mental toughness it has long since been one of the most important aspects of sporting performance (Gould et al., 1987). Research shows that sport performers achieving the best results are those with more mental toughness, as measured by commonly associated attributes (Crust & Clough, 2005; Golby & Sheard, 2004).
Research conducted on international athletes has attempted to define and identify key attributes of mental toughness in order to set fourth a universally accepted set of attributes (Jones, 2002). From the study, a definition of mental toughness emerged as having a psychological edge that enables:
The attribute of self belief emerged to be the most critical aspect of mental toughness closely followed by motivation in the form of desire and determination (Jones, 2002).
Other important attributes of mental toughness were:
This study made clear conclusions regarding a generally accepted view of mental toughness from the qualitative interviews of international athletes themselves, giving a valid representation of such an important sporting quality.
As mental toughness is so important for sporting performance, how does one become more mentally tough? Development of mental toughness is a long term process that requires many underlying mechanisms that operate in combination to achieve such a mind set (Connaughton, Wadey, Hanton & Jones, 2008). These underlying mechanisms are associated with the motivational climate of an athlete (whether they are involved in sport for enjoyment or for rewards). In addition, coaches, parents and peers are amongst many individuals who affect the mental toughness of an athlete with the work of a sport psychologist playing a pivotal role too (Connaughton et al., 2008). Experiences in and outside of sport and internalised motives to succeed are also important aspects of developing mental toughness (Connaughton et al., 2008). Once mental toughness has been developed the maintenance relies on an internalised desire and motivation to succeed, a support network within and outside of the sporting environment and effective use of basic and advanced psychological skills (Connaughton et al., 2008).
Whilst it is not certain what exactly may equate to mental toughness, it is a commonly accepted view that mental toughness is as important to sporting performance as physical ability. Perhaps mental toughness is different for every individual and what defines it is not something that can be put into words but something you know is there inside of your mind that gives you the strength to push on when it gets tough, ignoring the pain and the opposition’s determination. When it seems the world is against you and everything is set out to destroy your performance, the mental toughness inside of you persists and does not give in.
There are many aspects of sport that can impact upon performance and the important thing to remember is that every single athlete there at that moment may also be competing against those setbacks too, whether it be bad weather conditions, tiredness and fatigue from travelling, not having enough sleep or not eating the right food prior to performance. What makes an athlete a champion is that regardless of all those implications that are standing in the way of the athlete and success, they stand tall in the face of adversity and remain in belief of their ability to win. Success does not come with time, it comes with toil and to those who persevere, compete with guts, dignity and integrity, holding themselves together when things are trying to tear their performance apart. Believe in yourself and the rest will follow.
“Mental toughness is the stuff of champions”
In this day and age, technology is everywhere we go. We carry it with us on a day to day basis and are glued to it when we leave work to go home. This is particularly prominent in the younger generation, which is affecting the health and wellbeing of our future prospects. This article will […]
In this day and age, technology is everywhere we go. We carry it with us on a day to day basis and are glued to it when we leave work to go home. This is particularly prominent in the younger generation, which is affecting the health and wellbeing of our future prospects. This article will touch on the stats which suggest technological advances have led children to become more sedentary than ever, how this affecting their health and wellbeing and how it might be possible to use gaming to encourage exercise, reviewing how exergaming has not been successful previously.
70% of young people do not undertake the recommended levels of PA per week according to recent statistics, which we know to have severe physical and psychological issues as a result. The reason they are becoming more sedentary… Technology. 62% of 11 year olds, 71% of 13 year olds and 68% of 15 year olds watch more than 2 hours of television a day on weekdays. In comparison, in Switzerland, television viewing across the same three age groups mentioned above was at 35% or below for all groups. In England, between 2006 and 2010, gaming time of 2+ hours per night during the week increased significantly from 42% to 55% in boys and from 14% to 20% in girls.
Government research has supported its previous work. Finding that increased TV viewing and game time increases anxiety levels in children. Moreover, it is likely to have a negative affect on children’s general wellbeing, including lower self worth, lower self esteem and lower levels of self happiness. The study also found that those children who do watch more TV and spend more time on computer games experience higher levels of emotional distress, anxiety and depression.
In spite of these problems, technology isn’t going away any time soon and is continuously producing more and more innovative products in what can only be described as a worldwide phenomenon. Instead of preventing the use of it as a sedentary behaviour (which is essentially impossible), why not use it to increase physical activity levels? The PlayStation released the ‘eye toy’ in 2003, which involved a camera that monitored movement to carry out fun activities through the PlayStation 2 console, including heading a football, cleaning windows as quickly as possible and boxing among a few. However this never really kicked on and a number of issues arose, such as lighting issues, meant fluidity of movement restricted gameplay, whilst the 2D nature of the games didn’t allow for complicated 3D movements.
Then there was the ‘Nintendo Wii’, which involved a sensored remote to track movement. This became extremely popular and advances led to the ‘Wii fit’ which was specifically designed so people could exercise at home, with guidancefrom an animated personal trainer who participants were able to set goals with., activities ranged from hula hooping to yoga. At the time it was innovative and easily accessible, however due to the nature of the motion sensor being within the remote itself, people were able to ‘cheat’ and discovered they did not have to run and jump as the console suggested. Also the animated images produced did not create the same visual effect that a PlayStation 3 or Xbox would, therefore not as stimulating to the imagination of the players minds.
More recently we had the ‘X box Kinect’, which incorporated a similar system to the eye toy, just with greater advances in the camera systems and 3D imaging. This created a more realistic gaming experience, and did involve physical activity. For one reason or another, the nostalgia wore off, and just like the eye toy and the Wii, the Kinect was left to collect dust. It seems that despite technological advances, exergaming goes through nostalgic spells that evidently are not able to sustain physical activity.
I think that despite the failures of previous gaming giants attempting to produce the next big thing in terms of exergaming, it does have the potential to increase physical activity levels, particularly during an age where so many of us use technology and do play video games. Although gaming has been popular for many years, I feel that now is the time for the next big step in exergaming, and hopefully can be used in the future as a tool for interventions in physical activity.
One of the most discussed topics in sport at present is the doping scandal and corruption that has taken place widespread across athletics, resulting in many athletes losing confidence in the sport and the people that govern it. As more and more information comes out of the woodwork about the possibility of athletes taking performance […]
One of the most discussed topics in sport at present is the doping scandal and corruption that has taken place widespread across athletics, resulting in many athletes losing confidence in the sport and the people that govern it. As more and more information comes out of the woodwork about the possibility of athletes taking performance enhancing drugs or covering up the intake of them, we witness many well known athletes that were once seen as incredibly talented individuals become better known for their lies and deceit towards the sport as the truth is uncovered regarding their doping involvement.
Recently, it became apparent that Ethiopian born 2014 World Indoor 1500m Champion, Abeba Aregawi, failed an out-of-competition dugs test and has voluntarily pulled out of competition whilst further tests are carried out. It has been rumoured that Aregawi has tested positive for Meldonium (also known as Mildronate). This is a performance enhancer originally meant for the treatment of Ischemia, which occurs due to a lack of blood flow to a limb causing the limb tissues to become starved of oxygen. Interestingly, Ethiopia’s 2015 Tokyo marathon winner Endeshaw Negesse has recently tested positive on a doping test for Meldonium. Other athletes to have reportedly tested positive for the drug are Ukrainian biathletes Artem Tyshchenko and Olga Abramova. Meldonium was only added to the World Anti-Doping Agency banned list on January 1st 2016, so there could yet be more and more athletes who test positive for this performance enhancer in the near future.
So, what exactly is Mildronate?
Also known as Meldonium, Mildronate was originally developed as a growth-promoting agent for animals and has since been identified as an effective anti-ischemic drug (Simkhovich et al., 1988). The clinical benefits of Mildronate stem from carnitine metabolism, which plays an important role regulating cellular energy metabolism via a fatty acid beta-oxidation pathway and glycolysis; in the mitochondria carnitine is the main molecule in fatty acid metabolism (Gorgens et al., 2015). Mildronate works to inhibit the last step of carnitine biosynthesis. During oxygen deficient conditions (anaerobic exercise), there is insufficient oxygen supply and a lower amount of free carnitine which means fatty acid metabolism is lowered and glycolysis is enhanced. This increases the effectiveness of ATP production. Rather than fatty acid oxidation producing energy, there is carbohydrate oxidation which requires less oxygen per ATP molecule compared to fatty acid oxidation (Liepinsh, Kalvinsh & Dambrova, 2011), making the body more efficient at producing energy in those tough, anaerobic states.
When it comes to showing the performance benefits of Mildronate, studies have demonstrated an increase in endurance performance in athletes, an improvement in recovery after exercise and an increase in learning and memory performance (Gorgens et al., 2015), which can be a benefit for many athletes across a wide variety of sports (Dzintare & Kalvins, 2012; Klusa et al., 2013). The use of such a drug has been shown to be worryingly vast across many elite sports and the easy access of Mildronate has allowed many athletes to use it freely and without guilt before the inevitable ban earlier this year (Gorgens et al., 2015).
Whilst it is wrong to take performance enhancing drugs and cheat your way to the top, we often forget the larger context and what it is that drives people to do this rather than just train hard like everyone else and be the best you can be naturally. The psychology of drug taking in sport is extremely interesting and opens your mind into an area that is very rarely discussed.
One of the most common reasons to use performance enhancing drugs in sport is to achieve athletic success, closely followed by financial gain (Morente-Sánchez & Zabala, 2013). This is important. Many athletes dedicate their lives to their chosen sport and sacrifice so much in order to gain huge performance accomplishments that could financially support their family and change their lives. The decision to take a drug to increase performance is a massive risk, however for some it could be an opportunity to enhance their performance to a level that would enable them to provide for their family and to make the years of gruelling training, knockbacks, giving up time with family, injury and psychological strain worth it. The mere thought of gaining recognition for sporting achievements as opposed to going unnoticed for so long is a tempting outlook, one which could push an athlete into believing that taking a performance enhancing drug is the only way forward.
On the other hand, some athletes are pressured by their coach or family members (Pitsch, Emrich & Klein, 2007). The power of manipulation stemming from a coach that craves world class results could pressure an athlete into taking a drug that they don’t even know is a banned substance. Who really knows what goes on in the world of athletics these days?
Some athletes genuinely believe that taking performance enhancing supplements is the only way to continue in their career or to prevent nutritional deficiencies, maintaining their ‘natural’ health (Erdman, Fung, Doyle-Baker, Verhoef & Reimer, 2007; Lentillon-Kaestner & Carstairs, 2010).
The concept of the “false consensus effect” has been studied in literature (Petroczi, Mazanov, Nepusz, Backhouse & Naughton, 2008) and it suggests that athletes who take performance enhancing drugs usually overestimate the prevalence of drug taking in sport. It seems that athletes who believe that other athletes are taking drugs to enhance their performance are more likely to take drugs themselves which could lead us into a vicious cycle that propagates a pro-doping culture (Tangen & Breivik, 2001; Uvacsek et al., 2011). This is something that can be applied to the doping culture in athletics of recent.
In relation is “the doping dilemma” which stems from the classical prisoner’s dilemma (Haugen, 2004). If there is suspicion that other athletes are doing, which there certainly is right now, other athletes feel they need to take performance enhancing drugs in order to play on a level playing field. The power of the unknown comes into play here, with athletes being sceptical as to whether the competitor on the start line next to them is clean or not. The decision to take performance enhancing drugs suddenly seems that little bit more acceptable.
When Lance Armstrong was asked whether he would dope again after being caught he replied with “If I was racing in 2015, no, I wouldn’t do it again because I don’t think you have to. If you take me back to 1995, when doping was completely pervasive, I would probably do it again.” When an athlete believes that everyone else is taking performance enhancing drugs they are more likely to take part in this same behaviour; social acceptability within a small, performance focused environment can pressure an athlete into doping whilst they strive to be the best.
Unfortunately there remains a lack of education surrounding the use of doping in sport and it is important that at an early age sport coaches should emphasis to their athletes that drug taking in sport is simply not an option; if a sport coach’s task is to educate their athletes in this way then the coach will be the primary source of sport education for that athlete (Vangrunderbeek & Tolleneer, 2010). Without such an education regarding this matter an athlete may be more likely to regard drug taking in sport as an option.
“We are more likely to cheat if we see others doing so. We tend to conform to accepted norms of reasonable behaviour, rather than adhere to strict rules.” – Evan Davis.
Whilst it is easy to point the finger at athletes who have taken drugs in order to enhance their sporting capabilities, we are far too reluctant to take into consideration the wider context and the problems that still face us regarding the lack of education for doping in sport. The above points are not excuses for doping, they are reasons, and behind the reason is a person who knows that the behaviour is wrong but still feels the need to go ahead with the decision to dope, even with all the devastating consequences that could follow.
A focus is needed on the antecedents of doping behaviour and associated attitudes and behaviours that lead up to the action. With a focus here and the correct education, doping in sport could be lowered and hopefully diminished in the long term, allowing a wide open space for natural ability to blossom through and a regaining of trust and confidence in sport.
In recent years there has been increasing acknowledgement of the problem of mental health in elite sport. Research shows that while sports people are susceptible to mental health problems to broadly the same extent as the wider community, there are a number of key risk periods – such as times of injury, retirement and competitive […]
In recent years there has been increasing acknowledgement of the problem of mental health in elite sport. Research shows that while sports people are susceptible to mental health problems to broadly the same extent as the wider community, there are a number of key risk periods – such as times of injury, retirement and competitive failure – when sports people may be particularly vulnerable to illnesses such as depression (Rice et al. 2016; Hughes and Leavey 2012).
In spite of the high incidence of mental health issues, concerns have arisen about the limited support-seeking amongst elite athletes, with stigma and fears of being viewed as weak cited as the most common reason for suffering in silence (Gulliver et al. 2012).
Stigma surrounding mental illness is not limited to a sporting context but is pervasive in society generally. However, it is also notable that stigma is tolerated variably, with research showing ethnic minorities, youth and men are disproportionately deterred from seeking support as a result of stigma (Clement et al. 2015).
Whilst there are variations between sports concerning the extent to which they have sought to address mental health issues, there remains a dominant narrative within sporting culture as a whole which promotes mental toughness.
Mental toughness has been defined by Jones (2002) as a psychological edge that enables you to ‘cope better than your opponents with the many demands (competition, training, lifestyle) that sport places on a performer. Specifically, be more consistent and better than your opponents in remaining determined, focused, confident, and in control under pressure.’ Given the emphasis on coping and control, the concept of mental toughness could be seen to be at odds with concepts of mental illness, with disclosure of mental illness and support- seeking potentially undermined by fears of being perceived as mentally weak (Bauman, 2016).
Indeed, research (not specifically sports-related) has indicated that those who rated high on ‘toughness’ were more likely to take a ‘wait and see’ approach rather than proactively seek treatment for depression (O’Loughlin et al.2011).
This leads to questions about whether the mental toughness narrative undermines efforts at addressing mental illness in sport. Indeed, it is notable that whilst a growing number of high-profile sports people have spoken about their mental health issues (e.g Dame Kelly Holmes, Marcus Trescothick, Damon Hill, Mike Tyson, Freddie Flintoff, Ian Thorpe, etc), the majority have done so once their careers have concluded, when there is less at stake professionally and perhaps also at a time when they are less immersed in a sporting culture that is uncomfortable with vulnerability.
That said, mental toughness interventions delivered by sports psychologists can also facilitate good mental health, with athletes who demonstrate high on mental toughness scales also tending to rate higher on the indices of mental health (Gucciardi et al. 2016). Promoting mental health and promoting mental toughness from this perspective can be complementary rather than oppositional stances, as long as there is space within these narratives for expressions of distress. However, recent research by Doherty et al. (2016) on the experience of depression in elite male athletes noted that there was little scope for athletes to admit vulnerability, stating ‘in addition to their worth being conditional on results, performances, and actions on the sporting stage, they were expected to express positivity, deny weakness, display emotionless qualities and fit the script of the mentally tough athlete’.
This fits with my experiences of working as a psychotherapist with sports people. Even when clients have the courage to acknowledge that they are struggling, accepting support is another challenge and seen as evidence of not coping. While mental toughness and coping go hand in hand, in the eyes of many, for coping to really count it must be done alone. Seeking out and committing to therapeutic input often seems to be a frightening prospect and one that challenges a sports person’s idea of themselves as mentally tough. Instead, people who are experiencing difficulty are prone to avoiding: avoiding feelings, denying vulnerability and ignoring what’s actually going on, as ways of maintaining the mentally tough persona, but at a cost. Often ways of avoiding difficult feelings become problems in themselves, such as excessive alcohol use, gambling, emotional disconnection and numbness, relationship problems, etc.
The barriers to expression of mental health issues and support-seeking are not only mediated by the cultures – sporting and otherwise – that someone identifies with. How people cope with distress is also a feature that arises at the individual level from childhood experiences of close attachment relationships (see attachment theory). Someone with a responsive caregiver, who was available to assist a child in the regulation of their emotional states, develops more adaptive coping strategies for times of crisis, being able to flexibly shift between self-regulatory strategies and turning towards others, with an expectation of others as reliable and available to offer comfort. Someone with an early experience in which caregivers were absent, either physically or emotionally, would not develop the expectation of others as emotionally responsive and would tend to withdraw and isolate at times of crisis with an over-reliance on coping alone.
To seek support and be comfortable doing so is not easy. First, a client has to tolerate stigma, both from others and their own internalised self-stigmatising beliefs. They must also be able to acknowledge a need for support without it presenting an intolerable challenge to their self-image.
Sporting organisations have a key role to play in encouraging this by moving towards a culture which supports rather than undermines recovery and values personal development as well as performance goals (Doherty 2016). This can be achieved by supporting athletes’ efforts at self-care, recognising key trigger points for mental health issues and actively encouraging the use of therapeutic input. Sports counselling or sports psychotherapy can help athletes expand their tolerance of difficult emotions, and broaden their self-identity and self-worth beyond sport whilst also honouring the many positives of a sporting career. Sport also needs to embrace a more nuanced understanding of mental toughness. To my mind, mental toughness is not just about coping and motivation, but also about facing – rather than avoiding – what is uncomfortable, and having the courage to acknowledge vulnerability and seek support at times of crisis.
“Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back, always ineffectiveness. Concerning all acts of initiative and creation, there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too.” – W.H. Murray (Scottish mountaineer and writer) The […]
“Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back, always ineffectiveness. Concerning all acts of initiative and creation, there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too.” – W.H. Murray (Scottish mountaineer and writer)
The Facts – Marathon Des Sables
The race consists of 6 days of running, covering approximately 156 miles in total, with the longest stage covering approximately 55 miles.
Based in Morocco, identifiably the Sahara Desert – heats sour to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
Rules require you to be self-sufficient, to carry with you on your back everything except water that you need to survive
So what exactly convinces these athletes to put their bodies and mind through this gruelling adventure in one of the world’s most hospitable climates? This is an event that will have inevitable setbacks and challenges that will need to be addressed throughout. This requires extreme levels of personal resilience in order to not only train, but to ultimately succeed. What are the secrets behind sustained performance in the most extreme environments?
Make intentions a reality: 1) Know what success is – First, define it. Success is not so much about the situation, event or outcome, it more represents what that ‘thing’ means to you. 2) Get comfortable being uncomfortable – expect injury, pain is a great teacher. 3) Identify the best course of action to take to survive – simplify.
Growth mindset: See your abilities as capable of being cultivated. Recognise that challenging yourself is an exciting part of learning, and that failure is a necessary component of success. When confronted with a tricky task, embrace the challenge, and pick yourself up if you fall. Keep your end goal in mind.
Resilient Character: Sir Ranulph Fiennes crossed the Antarctica completely on foot. After losing 5 stone during his expedition (despite eating 8000 calories a day) due to the amount of effort of trawling the equipment, losing the tips of his fingers on his left hand due to gangrene, and ensuring his colleague continued with the expedition despite gangrene in both his feet and having a severe head injury, they completed what he had set out to do. Ranulph bases his success on not wanting to let his father and grandfather down, but perhaps more importantly, it is the application of his underlying resilience and determination. How many of us would give up if put in that position? Look beyond the immediate challenge to the long term goal.
Well-Being: Place a great deal of importance on your general health – this can have an effect on your resilience. Mauro Prosperi, who competed in the Marathon Des Sables in 1994, was hit by a ferocious sandstorm that lasted 8 hours. After waking he was completely lost, and for 10 whole days he was without bearing of his surroundings and completely alone in the heat of the Sahara. Mauro realised he needed to conserve the strength he had remaining. As soon as he realised he was lost, the first thing he did was urinate in a spare water bottle. After 2 failed attempts to raise the alarm to crossing planes, he began to feel very depressed – he attempted to commit suicide. After surviving death he decided to see this circumstance as a new competition against himself. He regained his strength and mental lucidity. From this point he was so aware of his body and health, and the maintenance of his well-being, he was able to survive. Through his attempt to find humanity he learnt that food was all around him. He rested during peak heat and made sure he was hydrated at all times before continuing on his journey. Mauro finally found a local community and was rescued. 4 years later Mauro returned and completed a further 8 desert marathons.
If you’re thinking about taking part in a challenge facing extreme environments, do your research. Luckily, I had the opportunity to speak with someone that has completed the MDeS in 2003 with vast experience in the health and fitness industry, so I have left you with some top tips and tricks:
The beauty with happiness is that it means different things for different people. For some people happiness is about living life to its full and living in the moment. To others, happiness is about helping people. Within society most people relate happiness to wealth and money. We live in a modern age where money is […]
The beauty with happiness is that it means different things for different people. For some people happiness is about living life to its full and living in the moment. To others, happiness is about helping people. Within society most people relate happiness to wealth and money. We live in a modern age where money is perceived to bring us the most happiness and without it people often worry and stress that they won’t be able to function. Money can bring us short term happiness but does not bring long term happiness for the pure fact that once you achieve a certain amount you will constantly want to achieve more. Your level of happiness will keep growing and growing and you will never feel as though you have reached your highest level.
Some people spend their whole lives trying to find happiness and I believe that perception plays a large role within this process. How you perceive the world will influence your level of happiness. Do you perceive happiness to be a social construct? Does society influence your view of happiness? What makes you truly happy? When trying to find happiness we think about what makes our friends or family happy. We spend very little time thinking about ourselves and being honest. As human beings we are naturally biased to remembering negative events. Therefore if you told someone to write down all the good and bad things that have happened over a week, they are more likely to remember the bad. Reflection plays an important role within happiness. How often do you reflect on the good things that have happened over your day, week, month or year? When you achieve a goal do you praise yourself for the goal? Most people who achieve their goals don’t give themselves enough credit.
So what is happiness? Happiness is unique to you. It is not a specific definition that has been constructed by society. It is not about trying to please others. Happiness is about understanding what makes you feel good. Happiness can lead to more success, better health and longevity. Did you know that out of 145 countries Panama leads the world in overall wellbeing? Costa Rica and Puerto Rico came 2nd and 3rd. This is related to the Global well being index that looks at 5 main elements:
The terms wellbeing and happiness are often used interchangeably. People associate high levels of wellbeing with high levels of happiness. Next time you think about happiness why don’t you think about these 5 constructs.
Summer is winding down over here in the States. Temperatures are cooling down, and leaves will soon begin changing colors. Fall is approaching, which means one thing in the U.S.: football season is upon us. Months of two-a-day practices in the summer heat and hours of meetings have prepared thousands of teams for the upcoming […]
Summer is winding down over here in the States. Temperatures are cooling down, and leaves will soon begin changing colors. Fall is approaching, which means one thing in the U.S.: football season is upon us.
Months of two-a-day practices in the summer heat and hours of meetings have prepared thousands of teams for the upcoming season. Historically, preparation has involved drills aimed at increasing physical strength, endurance, and agility, as well as positional meetings between players and coaches where strategy and set plays are carefully reviewed. However, as in many other sports, the emergence of sport and performance psychology has become an increasingly popular addition to the training regimen.
Commonly used techniques in sport performance psychology include goal-setting, positive self-talk, and visualization. However, the emergence of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT; Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999) in the realm of clinical psychology has spawned a novel application to sport psychology, as manifested by approaches such as the Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment-Approach (Gardner & Moore, 2007)
ACT is a form of behavior therapy that incorporates traditional behavioral techniques with the concepts of mindfulness, acceptance of thoughts and emotions, and values. The primary focus of ACT is the promotion of the ability to contact the present moment fully, and act in accordance with one’s chosen values based on the situation (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 2012). Based on this focus, researchers have hypothesized that ACT may help athletes focus their attention on their actual performance in athletic situations, rather than being overly involved with worry, anxiety, frustration, or other thoughts and emotions that can interfere with an athlete’s ability. ACT attempts to enhance performance through six ideals: acceptance, cognitive defusion, making and maintaining contact with the present moment, self as context, recognition of values, and committed action towards value-driven behavior (Twohig, 2012).
Acceptance involves a mindset where one is willing to experience emotions or thoughts without having to label these experiences as positive or negative and without allowing them to influence behavior (Hayes et al., 1999). Acceptance may be practiced when facing a rival team in a road game, with the opposing crowd taunting one’s team and trying to upset the players. Learning to accept the noise from the opposing team as a natural part of the game without judging the sounds as distracting, demeaning, or frustrating would be an example of practicing acceptance. Rather than trying to drown out the noise, which most would argue is an impossible task, the goal is instead to make room for it; to acknowledge that the noise can exist with optimal performance.
Cognitive defusion is the process of viewing thoughts simply as automatic events unfolding in the mind that do not have to influence behavior (Hayes et al., 1999). Defusion may be particularly relevant for a quarterback reading the defense before executing a play. A linebacker may be slowly inching towards the line, preparing to blitz. The quarterback knows that the play call is for a quick slant, and he knows that with the timing of the play he will be able to complete the pass before the linebacker gets to him. However, the thought of the inevitable hit he will receive may cause the quarterback to make an errant throw. The quarterback would be practicing defusion by telling himself “I’m having the thought that I will get blitzed,” and rather than clinging to this thought so rigidly that he panics and makes a bad call, he envisions it as though the thought is physically standing on the sidelines while he continues with the play. The thought isn’t gone and the quarterback can still see it very clearly; however, it is not occupying the entirety of his mental vision.
Contact with the present moment refers to staying present with one’s current situation versus being overly focused on past or future events (Harris, 2009). Present-moment awareness can be thought of as focusing on the current play versus previous plays in the game that may have gone poorly or that a player may have made a critical mistake on. For example, a wide receiver who drops several catchable balls in the first half of the game may think of himself as having a case of the “drops,” and may worry about catching the football late in the fourth quarter because of his previous mistakes. By remaining focused on the present-moment instead of ruminating about past performance, the receiver can allow all of his attention to be used on catching that late, crucial pass instead of allowing his past performance to dictate his present performance.
The conceptualized self refers to self-evaluations that are formed through communication with other people and the world around us (Harris, 2009). In other words, the conceptualized self is who we view ourselves to be. In some cases, the conceptualized self can be helpful, such as a cornerback believing he can cover anyone and that he is a shutdown corner. However, the self can also be overly influenced by negative events. If the same cornerback gets badly beaten by a receiver numerous times because he became too sure of himself and thus underestimated the receiver, the corner may believe that he has lost his ability or that he isn’t able to cover this receiver. The self-story he had once relied on is now hurting him. It is important in this situation for the cornerback to realize that this circumstance is due to a variety of factors – the other player’s ability, the defensive and offensive schemes, and the position of other players on the field, to name a few – and that he has to rely on more than his own self-impressions to make important decisions.
Values-driven behavior is the ability to behave in a way that is congruent with one’s goals and values (Hayes et al., 1999). A linebacker who wants to be the head of the defense and the most feared player by the other team has to not only consciously accept and work towards this image, but most importantly acknowledge his love for the sport, the dedication to his team, and his desire to continually improve himself as a player and leader.
After recognition of values comes committed action to values, which involves engaging in productive behavior even in the face of undesirable thoughts, emotions, or events (Harris, 2009). This is of particular importance in football when the daily grind of practice, player meetings, and team meetings can be both physically and mentally exhausting even for the most experienced players. It is inevitable for a player to feel as if he cannot give 100 percent in a weight training session or give his full attention during film study. Reminding himself of the player he wants to become and realizing that, in order to become that player he needs to push through the fatigue, and then following through on this realization by consistently working hard, would be practicing committed action.
As the season unfolds, I will be posting additional articles concerning the application of ACT to the game of football, using specific examples to illustrate the six core concepts of ACT in greater detail. For additional information about ACT or MAC approach, refer to my previous articles, read the resources listed below in the references section, or contact me at email@example.com. Who’s ready for some football?
I dislike how we use the word ‘talent’. A quick google of the word ‘talent’ provides the following definition: natural aptitude or skill. Despite this rather narrow definition, I feel ‘talent’ is too often given as the independent reason and cause to explain how people reach elite performance in sport. I would instead argue that […]
I dislike how we use the word ‘talent’. A quick google of the word ‘talent’ provides the following definition: natural aptitude or skill. Despite this rather narrow definition, I feel ‘talent’ is too often given as the independent reason and cause to explain how people reach elite performance in sport. I would instead argue that talent is not enough.
My argument isn’t a new one, yet it still fails to pervade lay understanding of elite performance. Of course, talent undoubtedly plays a role in helping sportspeople to reach elite performance, though there are other factors which are too often neglected. Let’s look at two of them: opportunity and prolonged deliberate practice.
One of my favourite illustrations of the importance of opportunity in reaching elite performance has been popularised by Malcolm Gladwell, who was citing a Canadian psychologist named Roger Barnsley (Gladwell, 2009). Whilst studying elite Canadian hockey players, Barnsley uncovered that 40% of professional players were born between January and March, 30% between April and June, 20% between July and September and only 10% between October and December.
Does this suggest players born between January and March have more talent, or ‘natural aptitude or skill’? I don’t think so. Rather, the cut-off for age-class hockey is the 1st of January in Canada. So, when coaches are scouting players for junior sides, they understandably choose those born earlier in the year since these children tend to be better due to their extra months of physical and motor development. The result is that only these children are able to regularly practice in the ice rink and benefit from professional coaching. This only serves to enlarge the performance gap between these children and their unfortunate peers who have equal talent but not opportunity. And despite this, we still attribute elite performance solely to natural talent.
2) Prolonged Deliberate Practice
Deliberate practice is a well-known concept in sport psychology, where individuals specifically look to practise specific skills to improve their performance. Equally well-known is the 10,000 hour rule where in general, elite sportspeople have had 10,000 hours of deliberate practice before they reach an elite level. Indeed, the importance of deliberate practice to reach an expert or professional level has become so well-known because it is based on a great level of empirical research (Colvin, 2010). For instance, in summarising their research, Ericcson, Krampe and Clemens (1993) stated:
“We deny that these differences are immutable, that is, due to innate talent. Only a few exceptions, most notably height, are genetically prescribed. Instead, we argue that the differences between expert performers and normal adults reflect a life-long period of deliberate effort to improve performance in a specific domain.”
So it’s clear that thousands of hours of deliberate practice are vital for elite performance. So why do we continue to label people as ‘talented’?
Maybe it’s because we like to put others on pedestals, praising their ‘supernatural’ talent because it’s the easiest reason for us to give. Maybe because it’s easier than saying ‘I might be able to be that good if I put in a few thousand hours of good practice’. Or maybe because it’s easy to see the current gap in ability between us and elite performers, but not the thousands of hours of practice that they had to put in to get there. Whatever the reason, research has dispelled the myth that talent is enough to ensure elite performance. Not only should we adopt this view because research supports it, but also because our current outlook on high performance merely serves to encourage a fixed mindset: ‘he/she is that good, you’re this good and there’s little you can do about it’. However, if we were to listen to the research, we’d have a far more positive and healthy understanding of high performance.
Although it’s undeniable that some individuals are born more talented than others (not all ice hockey players born in January are scouted by coaches!), a huge amount of research has shown us that natural talent is rarely enough for elite performance. By recognising the importance of opportunity and deliberate practice, I’ve only scratched the surface in accounting for what underlies elite performance. For instance, attitude and resilience, amongst other factors, are also undoubtedly key to reaching world-class performance.
Why do you think we continue to use the word ‘talent’ as the sole reason underlying high performance?
What else do you think needs to accompany talent to reach elite performance?
We are now looking at a situation in the Western world where obesity is becoming an epidemic. Reports suggest that over 35% of people in the USA (National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES)) in 2010. Reports also suggested that about 25% of people in Britain (NHS 2008) and Ireland (OECD 2010) are reported to be […]
What is sporting injury? Injury is a common issue facing all sport performers (Ristolainen et al. 2012). Sporting injury can be defined as “loss or abnormality of bodily structure, or functioning, resulting from an isolated exposure to physical energy during sports training or competition, that following examination is diagnosed by a clinical professional as a […]
What is sporting injury?
Injury is a common issue facing all sport performers (Ristolainen et al. 2012). Sporting injury can be defined as “loss or abnormality of bodily structure, or functioning, resulting from an isolated exposure to physical energy during sports training or competition, that following examination is diagnosed by a clinical professional as a medically recognized injury” (Timpka et al. 2014: p.425). There are two types of sports injury; acute and overuse (Fagher & Lexell 2014). Acute/traumatic injuries refer to the immediate, or first time, occurrence of an injury (Flint et al. 2014), caused by a specific event (Fuller et al. 2006), such as, the breaking of an ankle after a sliding tackle in football. While overuse/chronic injury is a reoccurring injury (Flint et al. 2014) caused by repeated micro trauma, with the source of the issue being unidentifiable (Fuller et al. 2006), such as tennis elbow. Acute and overuse injuries can be caused by physical factors, such as contact (Ivancic 2012), as well as psychological factors including stressors such as perfectionism (Masten et al. 2014). The sports injury response most commonly discussed is physical pain and discomfort however, psychological responses also play a role in the road to recovery (Walker et al. 2007). As injuries have the potential to be career ending (Fuller et al. 2006), the concept of injury is usually associated with negative emotions (Evans et al. 2008).
Numerous models and psychological emotions/responses to injury exist. However, it is beyond the scope of this paper to cover every response. Therefore, only several models and responses will be identified. Two models that have attempted to identify the psychological response process athletes enter post injury are the 5-stage grief response model (Kubler-Ross 1989), and the Integrated Model of Response to Injury (Weise-Bjornstal 1998). The 5-stage grief response model (Kubler-Ross 1989) is based on an athlete experiencing grief post injury. Despite limitations, such as a lack of individual differences, this model has been used to explain psychological responses to sports injury for years (Walker et al. 2007). The 5 stages include:
1 – Denial
2 – Anger
3 – Bargaining
4 – Depression
5 – Acceptance
However, Weise-Bjornstal et al. (1998) proposed another model; The Integrated Model of Response to Sports Injury, incorporating both grief and cognitive appraisal responses (Walker et al. 2007). The model views injury as a dynamic process, taking personal and situational factors into consideration, with regards to rehabilitation adherence, while also outlining cognitive, emotional, and behavioural responses to sports injury (Weise-Bjornstal et al. 1998). Both Kubler-Ross (1989) and Weise-Bjornstal et al. (1998) emphasize the importance of adhering to the rehabilitation program, without which recovery process time is increased. As both models are concerned with adherence to rehabilitation programs it is suggested both models are more applicable to long term/severe injuries (Levy et al. 2008).
Walker et al. (2007) identified self-motivation as the most important factor concerned with rehabilitation adherence. Therefore, it can be suggested with increased motivation, adherence is improved, resulting in positive health outcomes (Grindley & Zizzi 2005), in this instance recovery. A psychological intervention used to increased motivation is imagery; ‘an experience that mimics real experience’ (Wesch et al. 2012: p.695). Within sport, imagery serves two functions: cognitive, the rehearsal of skills (Milne et al. 2005), and motivational, imagining goals and the steps required to achieve them (Wesch et al. 2012). With regards to a rehabilitation program cognitive imagery can be used to rehearse strengthening exercises, such as pistol squats, while motivational imagery can be used to set a goal date for recovery.
Psychological emotions/responses to injury include body image; one’s thoughts and feelings about their own body (Grogan 1999). Performers with chronic/severe injuries may suffer from a loss of athleticism (Cassidy 2006b), whereby the performer loses muscle definition and/or skill ability during inactivity (Cassidy 2006a). A result of this can be an increase in anxiety prior to sporting return (Monsma et al. 2009). Increased anxiety is associated with re-injury concerns, not being able to achieve one’s goals, and a lack of competency (Podlog & Eklund 2006), all of which can have a negative impact upon performance. Consider a rugby performer’s goal was to achieve the same standard of performance prior to injury, but do not enter a tackle with 100% commitment due to re-injury concerns. Consequently, frustration may occur (Walker et al. 2007), as the player is not tackling to their full potential. This can lead to reduced competence, whereby the athlete is not sensing effectiveness in the activity they are undertaking, resulting in disinterest. To restore competence goal setting (GS) can be used (Podlog & Eklund 2006). However, it is crucial GS follows the SMART principles (specific, measureable, attainable, relevant, & timely) (Johnson et al. 2014), and allow the athlete to have a say in the goal being set (Podlog et al. 2011), thus ensuring the performer’s autonomy is preserved (Podlog & Eklund 2006).
Athletic identity (Madrigal & Gill 2014); “the extent to which a person identifies with the athlete role” (Horton & Mack 2000: p.102), is another response to injury weakened during situations where the sport-related outcome is unfavorable (Grove et al. 2004), such as injury. Consequently, the individual cannot train and/or compete. Therefore, the behaviours of the individual are not in line with those of an athlete (Perrier et al. 2014). Consider a rugby player who cannot train or compete due to injury, he/she may no longer identify as an athlete, as they are not carrying out the similar behaviours.
A reduction in athletic identity can lead to a state of depression (Madrigal & Gill 2014) through the loss of social support groups, such as team members, causing the injured individual to feel isolated (Cassidy 2006a). From which motivation towards the individual’s sport can change (Proios 2012). All of these factors can negatively impact performance. For example, a change in motivation from autonomous to controlled (Chan et al. 2011) can result in an attitude change, whereby the performer may no longer care about their performance (Martin & Horn 2013) and therefore, do not put 100% effort into training resulting in not being selected for the team. This can further reduce an individual’s athletic identity (Grove et al. 2004) and feeling of isolation, as the performer is pushed further away from team situations. To overcome motivational changes and a loss of social support Chan et al. (2011) suggests the trans-contextual model can be used to transfer motivation from coaches to the performer. For example, if coaches remained autonomously supportive of the injured performer throughout the recovery process, the performer will not lose their social support network (Cassidy 2006b) and may retain their own autonomous motivation from feeding off of the coach’s, which as previously identified is key to rehabilitation adherence (Walker et al. 2007).
Within the constraints of this paper the issues outlined above have highlighted several psychological responses to injury. A more extensive review would identify additional responses, including the perception of weakness.
Four decades after the beginning of the global obesity epidemic, awareness of the threat of obesity to the population’s health and well-being can be seen in a plethora of national reports and strategic plans from various countries, however, conversion to action remains mainly unrealised (Swinburn et al., 2011). Posing the question: Why? Divergent beliefs exist […]
Four decades after the beginning of the global obesity epidemic, awareness of the threat of obesity to the population’s health and well-being can be seen in a plethora of national reports and strategic plans from various countries, however, conversion to action remains mainly unrealised (Swinburn et al., 2011). Posing the question: Why?
Divergent beliefs exist about what drives and sustains obesity, consequently, substantial debate surrounds who is responsible for delivering effective actions and what, specifically, these actions should entail.
The determinants of obesity and its solutions are complex, however, many of these debates have become entrenched in overly simple dichotomies that present seemingly competing perspectives. Examples of such dichotomies include: individual versus environmental causes, government regulation versus industry voluntary codes, top-down versus bottom-up drivers for change, evidence-based versus lobby-responsive policy and making and prioritisation of treatment versus prevention. Genuine progress lies beyond the impasse of these entrenched dichotomies. Therefore, an urgent rethinking of causes, enablers, and barriers to change is required to begin to make a difference in the global obesity epidemic (Kleinert & Horton, 2015).
This narrative previews papers in The Lancet’s 2015 Series on Obesity, which provides an opportunity for such a rethinking. Papers in the series identify high priority actions on key obesity issues and challenge some of the entrenched dichotomies that dominate thinking about obesity and its solutions.
In the first paper of the series, Roberto and colleagues (2015) challenge the false dichotomy that obesity is driven by either personal choice or environment influence, and suggest that the two competing perspectives be merged to show the reciprocal relationship between individual person and environment. Roberto and colleagues (2015) discuss that obesity must be reframed to acknowledge that individuals will bear some responsibility for their health, yet, on the other hand, environmental factors exploit biological, psychological, social and economic vulnerabilities, making it easier for individuals to consume unhealthy products. A vicious cycle is then created in which preferences and demands for unhealthy food are not only shaped by the environment, but lead to environmental changes. Thus, this cycle makes it difficult for people to act in their long-term self-interest, yet Roberto and colleagues (2015) comment it can be broken by regulatory action from governments and joint efforts from industry and civil society to create healthier food environments.
The second paper by Hawkes and colleagues (2015) also challenges the dichotomy between a traditional public health-based perspective (which identifies food systems, food environments, and food industry as leading causes of obesity) and an individual-based perspective (which argues that consumer demand drives unhealthy food consumption because the market simply delivers what consumers want). Hawkes and colleagues (2015) discuss that the learning, expression, and reassessment of food preferences in the context of individual’s environments are important elements in understanding how food polices work. Indicating that effective food policy actions are tailored to preference, behavioural, socio-economic, and demographic characteristics of the individuals they seek to support, are designed to work through the mechanisms through which they have greatest effect, and are implemented as part of a combination of mutually reinforcing actions.
The paper by Huang and colleagues (2015) challenges the false dichotomy that either top-down (e.g. government) or bottom-up (e.g. grassroots) solutions are needed. Public health officials and political leaders tend to focus on top-down solutions (i.e. polices that can be passed down to alter the environment and improve health). Although, the passage of policies is pivotal, there is a need to mobilise policy from the bottom-up. The paper emphasises that public mobilisation is needed to enact obesity prevention and to mitigate reaction against their implementation. Huang and colleagues (2015) focus on bottom-up strategies that view people as active agents who can change their environments, not as passive recipients of information and change as top-down strategies do.
Closing the series is a paper by Swinburn and colleagues (2015), who focus on a shift from a responsibility to an accountability framework (diminishing arguments about who is to blame for obesity), which involves multiple actors of varying degrees of power over one another to ensure each other’s performance. Swinburn and colleagues (2015) propose a four step accountability framework (take the account, share the account, hold to account, and respond to the account). The framework identifies multiple levels for change, including innovative application of quasi-regulatory approaches which hold some promise to overcoming the impasse of the debate of whether to use regulatory or voluntary policies.
In conclusion, overall this Lancet series offers the reader an understanding of why conversion to action has remained mainly unrealised. However, by rethinking obesity, major areas (e.g. fundamental framing of the issues, food policies and societal movement for change) for potential progress have emerged. The papers in this series, challenge dichotomies, seek improved ways to move forward by understanding interactions, synergies, alternative frames, and different pathways within the complexity of obesity (Swinburn et al., 2015). Ultimately, we now need to turn this progress into serious strides to reverse the tide in the global obesity epidemic.
Given the high demands of life in our fast moving society, we are all vulnerable to experiencing feelings of both stress and anxiety. Feelings of nervousness, worry and fear are therefore common symptoms, which are normal emotions to feel from time to time. Panic attacks, however, are more than just feelings of stress and anxiety. […]
Given the high demands of life in our fast moving society, we are all vulnerable to experiencing feelings of both stress and anxiety. Feelings of nervousness, worry and fear are therefore common symptoms, which are normal emotions to feel from time to time. Panic attacks, however, are more than just feelings of stress and anxiety.
A panic attack is a rush of intense psychological and physical symptoms, that onset suddenly and are extremely intense. Panic attacks impact upon thoughts, perceptions and emotions, and are experienced through many unpleasant physical sensations. These symptoms can occur either unexpectedly or can be triggered by fears, phobias or trauma. Panic attacks generally peak at around 10 minutes before symptoms reduce but they generally last between 5 and 20 minutes.
Panic attacks are not recognised as a mental health condition on their own. According to the DSM – IV – TR a panic attack is characterised by four or more of the following symptoms:
Physical symptoms of panic attacks are caused by the body going into “fight or flight” mode, in response to a perceived threat. Breathing quickens as the body tries to increase oxygen levels in the blood. Hormones, such as adrenaline, are also released causing the heart to beat faster and muscles to tense up.
When experiencing a panic attack, remaining calm and concentrating on breathing are important to help symptoms subside quickly. Breathing in deeply through your nose and slowly out of your mouth can help to reduce the symptoms of a panic attack. As levels of carbon dioxide in the blood return to normal, you will begin to start feeling better, although you may feel tired.
Although scary, generally panic attacks are not damaging to your health. However, if symptoms continue for more than 20 minutes, you still feel unwell after your breathing returns to normal, you still have a rapid or irregular heartbeat or chest pains after the panic attack has subsided or you have regular panic attacks you may need to seek medical advice.
Social influence looks at how behaviour can be changed through pressures from others within a social context, once this pressure is understood it can be in turn used to influence participation in physical activity and exercise (Darlow & Xu, 2011). In exercise it has been shown how when the social pressures within an exercise group be […]
Social influence looks at how behaviour can be changed through pressures from others within a social context, once this pressure is understood it can be in turn used to influence participation in physical activity and exercise (Darlow & Xu, 2011). In exercise it has been shown how when the social pressures within an exercise group be it in a gym setting or a more social setting, social influence plays a role in participation and effort (Yuna & Silkb, 2011). Exercise is known generally as being a healthy behaviour with many benefits both physically and mentally (Bishop-Bailey, 2013). It has been found that some individuals become addicted to exercise and physical activity, making it a compulsion to engage in excessive exercise frequently leading to both psychologically and physiological impairing (Gapin et al. 2009). There are many names for this phenomena such as exercise dependence, exercise addiction, obligatory exercise, compulsive athleticism, compulsive exercising, and exercise abuse (Lichtenstein et al. 2014). As stated exercise can be addictive and in a social settings with pressures to participate with maximal effort in conjunction with others, can exercise addiction be fuelled in this setting if so what are the issues it raises. But is this pressure always a negative there can be positive as well, in order for treat exercise addiction social influence and assistance is vital.
There are multiply similarities between exercise addiction and drug addiction, the similarities include effects on tolerance, mood and withdrawals (Brown et al. 2010). The neurotransmitters which is the brains reward system is key in exercise and other addictions. An example of such a neurotransmitter is dopamine which has been found to be key in the brains rewarding system, a studies have been shown that regular excessive exercise can influence these sections of the brain which involve dopamine (Tanaka et al. 2009). As with many addictions exercise has symptoms, these symptoms in exercise addiction can be both mental and physical (Krivoschekov & Lushnikov, 2011). Once these symptoms arise within an exercise group, the group may see them as just the norms of exercise and pressure can be applied in order for the symptoms to be pushed aside and continue to exercise, as within the social context of the exercise group these maybe seen as the norms (Johnston et al. 2011). The symptoms of exercise addiction range across many fields and in terms of behaviour each person will react differently to situations. These behaviour can include a person’s desire to control their body both its weight, shape and size (Kiadó, 2012). It has been found that the main motivation in this strive and desire is to achieve the exercise induced “high”. This “high” is translated across many sports with many different phrases, in weight lifting it is described as “the pump” in long distance running its referred to as “the runners high” although it has different names and terminology it is the same euphoric feeling (Dishman & O’Connor, 2009). This euphoric state can become addictive and is a part of exercise addiction draws into compulsion. The social group setting of exercise applies pressure to members of the group when discussing this “high” other who may not have of experienced it will feel a need to experience this euphoria by further pushing themselves within exercise to reach this state. Pressure to adhere to exercise no matter how excessive within a social group setting mean that individuals meet the norms of the group and these norms within a this social setting maybe quite different from them of general society (McGrath, O’Malley, & Hendrix, 2011). The social pressures in the group depend on the norms of the groups, the positive effects of continuous exercise mentally and physically are well known and documented, but within the group if these positive effects are distorted to meet internal goals which are difficult to achieve the process of achieving them can become addictive (Wilson et al. 2012). There are factors which can affect the group’s persuasive powers on an individual’s thoughts feelings and behaviours in terms of exercise (Carron et al. 1996). There have been a few methods put forward when it comes to measuring exercise addiction through questionnaires, but Hausenblas and Downs (2002a) identified some problems with these questionnaires. They found they can indirectly measure addiction through withdrawal symptoms, they were too specific in their focus meaning they were fixed on one activity (e.g. cycling, running, weightlifting), they discover how most questionnaires failed to provide a definition of exercise addiction and did not distinguish between primary or secondary dependence of the addiction and they were not theory driven so had no conceptual basis.
Chapman and De Castro (1990) developed the first method of identifying exercise addiction with their Running Addiction Scale (RAS) which has been used in other studies directed at running (Aidman and Woollard, 2003). From their review Hausenblas and Downs (2002b) developed the 21-item Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS). This scale can be used to determine and categorised exercise addiction into three categories, these are ‘at risk for exercise dependence’, ‘nondependent symptomatic’, or ‘non-dependent-asymptomatic’ groups. One limitation of this scale is that it does not distinguish between primary and secondary exercise dependence Hausenblas and Downs (2002b).There is no precise way to measure social influence there have been many theories put forward to explain social influence, these theories along with theories of exercise addiction will further look to draw conclusions to the effect they can have on exercise groups.
The social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1986) was developed with an emphasis on the acquisition of social behaviours, social cognitive theory continues to emphasise that learning occurs in a social context and that much of what is learned is gained through observation. This is turn can help to show how exercise behaviour can be influenced by human cognition and external stimuli, this can play a role in exercise behaviour within groups (Annesia et al. 2011). This feeds into Orfords (2001) model of addictive behaviours called The Social Behavioural Cognitive Moral Model of Excessive Appetites, Orford preferred the term appetite in place of addictive. This model looked at how a person’s involvement in an addictive behaviour can come about due to some factors which include personality, opportunities to take part in the activity and the normative influence of friends (Orford, 2001). This looks at the influence of friends or leaders in exercise groups, Parastatidou et al. (2012) looked at how this theory can be used to explain how adherence levels increase when involved in an exercise group, this looks at how social influence plays a role in exercise groups. Mónoka et al. (2012) discovered in his studies on exercise addition once it becomes a behaviour within a close groups can spread to others as the beliefs, goals and attitudes can change. In this group setting the Theory of Planned Behaviour can play a role with how the control over the situations within the exercise setting can become more controlling (Hagger et al. 2010). This theory can show how a favourable attitude towards exercise can happen due to pressure within a group, this attitude change can be to one of an addictive nature with exercise due to the group’s beliefs, norms and pressures (Prochaska, 2013).
The “high” discussed earlier obtained through exercise can influence the addiction process, this is can be seen in the Stimulus Response Theory through positive reinforcement of the “high” and also from within the exercise groups setting (Manzi et al. 2009). The positive intrinsic reinforcements in studies have been said to be the “high”, increased self-efficacy, more energy and increased confidence (Raichlen et al. 2012). The extrinsic reinforcements can be praise from others or compliments, within an exercise groups these extrinsic reinforcement can lead to greater adherence to the exercise behaviours within the group (Kelley et al. 2013). Can the persuasion within a group effect an individual’s judgement towards exercise, the theory of reasoned action looks at how behaviour can be influenced by both the attitudes towards the behaviour and also the influence of social environment and general subjective norms on the behaviour. These social norms in an exercise group can be set by the leaders in the group and/or others held in high regard with the attitude they convey to the group (Fishbein & Ajzen, 2011). If these attitudes are of an addictive nature towards exercise this in turn can lead to the overall social norm on the group being one of the same (Cook et al. 2013). In the group the social facilitation theory of effort within the group in studies have shown how when being observed in the group by both peers and external observers perceived effort levels increases (Snyder, Anderson-Hanley, & Arciero, 2012). These theories all look at the social influences which may push the group towards exercise addiction norms and behaviours, the conceptual model of group cohesion looks at how the group becomes a cohesive group showing how these previous theories can then become prevalent in the influence of exercise addiction in the exercise group (Jenkins & Alderman, 2011). This development of group cohesion has been shown to increase adherence, feelings of distinctiveness, group norms and making sacrifices for the group (Spink et al. 2013). Research into group cohesion has been based around Carron et al. (1985) conceptual model of group cohesion. This model states that there are two predominant categories of group cohesion. The first category is group integration this look at the member’s view on how the group functions as a unit (Carron, 1985), within the exercise group setting this can mean the group are achieving their goals both collectively and individually (Burkea & Shapcott, 2010). In terms of exercise addiction this category the individual leaders who are intensely and frequently exercising may feel that others need to be matching the example they set (Weinberg & Gould, 2010). The second category is individual attraction and this reflects how attractive the groups is to an individual (Carron, 1985), within an exercise group this can explain the adherence to the group as the exercise addiction is the groups norm, therefore external norms against the addiction are not a prevalent (Weinberg & Gould, 2010). These two categories are further divided into two more categories, task and social cohesion. Task cohesion involves the degree to which members will work together to achieve group goals, this can involve many facets within an exercise group such as motivation, education and drive (Caperchione et al. 2011). Social cohesion looks at the relationships within the group and if member’s like each other and the social interactions, in an exercise group with exercise addiction as a driving force the social relationships are formed through exercise (Pitkala et al. 2011). These theories and models looked at the group’s ability to become cohesive and how exercise can become an addiction in some situations. This information looked at the group and its influences on its members as well as how the addiction may spread across the group to become an acceptable norm, within this new norm there are positive and negative pay offs to the addiction (Weinberg & Gould, 2010).
Exercise has psychological benefits such as stress reduction, prevent cognitive decline, increased relaxation, increased self-confidence and alleviate anxiety to name a few (Hogan, Mata, & Carstensen, 2013). In a study by Ruby et al. (2011) another benefit to exercise is the ability for it to control addiction, it was stated that the release of dopamine during exercise helps to reduce addiction in other fields such as drugs and alcohol which release the chemical dopamine. Weinstein and Weinstein (2014) investigated how this release of dopamine can not only control addiction but become itself an addiction. Thayer (1989) produced a two dimensional model of mood and its link with general bodily arousal which includes conscious components of energy and tension. This model is applicable as it shows how the psychological benefits involved with arousal states later researched by Sakairi et al. (2013), looks at how self-regulation of mood state can be obtain through exercise, reaching their optimal mood state. It has been shown that exercise can benefit moods (Johansson et al. 2011) and change emotions (Zi-xin & De-long, 2011) both in terms of pleasant and unpleasant emotions. These positive and negative changes in emotions and mood states can contribute to the “high” experience within exercise (Anderson & Brice, 2011), part of this feeling can carry into post exercise recovery and even beyond with the levels of unpleasant emotions and negative mood factors such as anxiety reduce due to exercise (Hamer, Endrighi, & Poole, 2012). The individuals experiences in exercise plays a role in how they perceive exercise, many group based studies have confirmed that there are psychological benefits which occur as a result of exercise (e.g. Rasmussen & Laumann 2013, Cruise et al. 2011 and Morgan & Goldston, 2013). These theories however have not paid attention to the individuals own unique experiences, the reversal theory can be used to predict exercise motivation and also experience (Brown, 1988). The reversal theory considers human behaviour is inherently inconsistent looking at the basis of human emotion, personality and motivation (Brown, 1988). Glasser (1976) looked at exercise and its general positive correlation with good health termed exercise as a “positive addiction” comparing exercise to more destructive addictions which had more severe consequences, later research however looked at the negative consequences of exercise addiction (Cook, Hausenblas, & Freimuth, 2014). The psychological benefits of exercise can aid participants in exercise but the benefits can also fuel exercise addiction (Lynch et al. 2013), the negative psychological consequences linked with exercise addiction have been proven to damage an individual both physically and mentally (Kiadó, 2014). Studies into social aspects of exercise addiction have shown that close relationships are pushed aside and deteriorate as the exercise regime does not allow for deviation (McNamara & McCabe, 2012), this behaviour has been shown in a group setting with similar goals and norms to encourage participation in the group activates isolating relationships and distractions outside of the groups norms (Meyer, 2011). Another consequences of exercise is injury, but in cases of exercise addiction it has been shown that athletes will exercise regardless of the injury or the pain (Lichtenstein et al. 2014). This can lead to the body not healing properly and in time this can limited the abilities of the individual, for a person who is involved in a groups who’s norm incorporate exercise addiction this can lead to depression form lack of ability to exercise (Heyman et al. 2012). Direct correlation between exercise addiction and depression have be shown to affect individuals who cannot meet the expectations of others in a group (Grandi et al. 2011), social facilitation plays a role in the individual exerting maximal effort and not meeting this level of perceived effort can lead to depression (Kiadó, 2013). Eating disorders are a major issue with people involved in in exercise but this issue increases dramatically with exercise addiction (Yates, 2013). In a group setting eating disorders are quite prevalent with leaders perceived in a group to have an ideal weight or body composition influences poor eating behaviours which have been shown to influence to group (Cook et al. 2011). There are many types of eating disorders to increase rapid body changes such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, in women who lose too much body fat rapidly can suffer from Amenorrhea which affects the menstrual cycle (Fietza, Touyz, & Hay, 2014). These eating disorders can lead to many other issues in both genders with anorexia physical damages are highly dangerous these include an irregular heartbeat, liver damage, muscle wasting, dehydration, malnutrition and sleep disturbances to name a few (Arcelus et al. 2011). All of these damages can lead to a lowered immune system, meaning the individual is more susceptible to illness and infection. Due to the severity of these damage to eating disorders it is important to try and identify them early on before damages become increasingly dangerous.
The Eating Attitudes Test (EAT) developed by Gamer and Garfinkel (1979) and the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) developed by Gamer and Olmsted (1984) measure and identify eating disorders with individuals, the reason for choosing these identifiers is there link with exercise in there testing (Rivasa et al. 2010). These disorder play a huge role in exercise addiction and how a group may influence such behaviours on some of its members through unjustified and delusional diet plans (Rohde et al. 2014). Exercise addiction as seen from information above as dangerous consequences once it is attached to a groups norms and individuals take part within the group are influenced to adhere to the norms, once an individual is addicted to exercise and intervention has been seen to be the best solution to alter this behaviour (Landolfi, 2013). The assignment has looked conclusively at exercise addiction and how groups can affect this addiction in other, also how exercise can be a secondary dependence where exercise can be secondary to an eating disorder or vice versa (Cook et al. 2013). Brown’s (1997) model and primary exercise dependence look at exercise addiction broken into sections to give a better understanding of the addiction and this in turn help to discover how to treat the addiction through understanding, this model looks into how the addiction is established and the cycles which affect individuals. Changing an individual with exercise addiction behaviours can be difficult because it has become a crucial part of their hedonic tone which is the experience of pleasurable mood and emotional states (Bruce et al. 2014), this means the behaviour is difficult to extinguish. Cutting down on exercise will be extremely difficult (Darlow & Xu, 2011), however if the individual changes activity from their primary one and cuts down slightly such as increased rest days this has been shown to help with the addiction as well as changing the time of day for exercise which breaks up the routine (Glasner-Edwards & Rawson, 2010). Education from outside of their exercise group form trained professionals on how rest days and proper nutrition (Veasey et al. 2013) can help them to healthy reach their target goals through safe and proven methods without long term consequences to mental and physical health (Epling & Pierce, 2013). Study into treatment for addiction stressed how clinical psychology in most extreme cases is required to help in dealing with the addiction. Through Browns (1997) model West & Brown (2013) look at how in the treatment of exercise addiction it is key for the individual to become more aware of the renforcement process of their behaviour leading to changes in personal decision making, they stated that the individuak must become more tolerant of short stages of unpleasent hedonic tone. This can lead to an ability to manipulate the hedonic tne but as found in the works of Kurimayet al. (2013) this can take up to seven years. The changes can be monitor through the continuous quality improvement (CQI) in Addiction Treatment Settings (Hunter et al. 2011).
In conclusion the assignment looks into social influence and its effects on exercise addiction in group exercise, looking at social influence (Lichtenstein et al. 2014) and exercise addiction (Dishman & O’Connor, 2009) separately then linking them together through various theories and studies. It is explained why individuals may become addicted to exercise either by the chemical releases (Tanaka et al. 2009) and personal experiences (Spink et al. 2013) or by the influence of others/leaders in an exercise group who’s norms accept the consequences of exercise addiction (Parastatidou et al. 2012). These consequences as detailed above affect the individual both mentally and physically in detrimental ways (Rivasa et al. 2010), with a look into proven methods of addiction treatment through different methods and techniques. The assignment looks into the affects a group can have on exercise addiction and how the addiction itself affects individuals, giving a revised and explored method of treatment.