Personal-Disclosure Mutual-Sharing (PDMS) and group functioning in sportNo Opinions
Enter your email to unlock dozens of free infographics!View infographics
Sign up as a rookie member to receive free guides, kitbags and news from The Performance Room
About Sarah Kelly
Sarah is a Clinical Psychologist who has worked in a variety of NHS services since 2002. Her specialist interests lie in obesity, coping and diabetes, disordered eating, and working with psychological barriers that impact on physical activity. Sarah is currently completing an MSc Sport and Exercise Psychology at Staffordshire University. She is also a keen runner and regularly competes in events ranging from 5K to half marathon
Personal-Disclosure Mutual-Sharing (PDMS) is an intervention whereby an individual consciously shares an issue or situation, with a group they belong to (i.e., sports team/peers), in attempt to find resolution through interpersonal interaction (Olarte 2003). The approach is consistent with a counselling approach in that emphasis is placed on personal disclosure underpinned by mutual sharing, empathy, and an encouragement of group members to understand each other’s experiences (Dryden 2006).
In terms of group functioning in applied sport settings, PDMS based intervention has been shown to encourage mutual communication of group values (Windsor, Barker & McCarthy 2011) amongst sport teams. Furthermore, qualitative study findings have reported links between a single PDMS intervention session and athlete reports of increased closeness and trust between teammates, and greater motivation to play as a team and with each other (Holt & Dunn 2006; Dunn & Holt 2004).
Dual phased PDMS intervention sessions with populations ranging from academy environments (Evans, Slater, Turner & Barker 2013) to adult football teams (Windsor, Barker & McCarthy 2014) have also produced interesting findings. For example, in a dual phase PDMS intervention, Barker, Evans, Coffee, Slater & McCarthy (2014) explored the effects of PDMS on social identity, particularly the social identity content components of friendship identity content (FIC) and results identity content (RIC). Findings suggested the dual-phase approach yielded desensitising effects with regards emotionality, with participants reporting feeling increasingly relaxed about sharing stories in the second phase of intervention. This suggests that, when conducted in a dual phased manner, PDMS can result in athletes sharing more emotive stories with their peers, which has an overall positive impact on team cohesion.
As a group intervention, it could thus be argued PDMS intervention studies have built on the existing team building literature. Findings also have implications for sport practitioners working in applied settings. To expand, there is a need for practitioners to acknowledge the personal and potentially provocative nature of information shared during PDMS intervention, which may concern other group members. These considerations are construed as vital to group therapy in counselling domains (Dryden 2006). Establishing boundaries and a contract with the group (prior to disclosure), which encourages honesty in an appropriate way is thus crucial and warrants skills of appropriately trained practitioners/professionals (Holt & Dunn 2006; Dryden 2006). It is also important to consider how disclosure beyond the realms of the group might be contained, for example, concerning an eating disorder, and the procedures and referral pathways to psychological support.
In terms of limitations, PDMS studies to date have not been able to explain mechanisms within a PDMS intervention that enhance group functioning (Barker et al 2014). There is also little application of PDMS into physical activity settings, with empirical studies to date tending to focus on team building per se (Burke et al 2006). Finally, given repeated exposure to PDMS appears linked to reduced anxiety around mutual sharing, longitudinal studies to track content of individual PDMS speeches and group processes over longer term studies are warranted. These are areas for future exploration.
ReferencesShow allBarker, J.B., Evans, A.L., Coffee, P., Slater, M.J., and McCarthy, P.J. (2014). Consulting on tour: A dual-phase personal-disclosure mutual sharing intervention and group functioning in elite group cricket. The Sport Psychologist, 28, 186-197.
Dryden, W. (2006). Counselling in a nutshell. London, UK; Sage
Dunn, J.G.H., 7 Holt, N.L. (2004). A qualitative investigation of a personal-disclosure-mutual-sharing team building activity. The Sport Psychologist, 18, 363-380.
Evans, A.L., Slater, M.J., Turner, M.J., & Barker, J.B. (2013). Using personal-disclosure and mutual-sharing to enhance group functioning in a professional soccer academy. The Sport Psychologist, 27(3), 233-243.
Holt, N.L. & Dunn, J.G.H. (2006). Guidelines for delivering personal-disclosure-mutual-sharing team building interventions. The Sport Psychologist, 20, 348-367.
Olarte, S.W. (2003). Personal disclosure revisited. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis & Dynamic Psychiatry, 31(4), 599-607.
Pain, M.A.,&Harwood, C.G. (2009). Knowledge and perceptions of sport psychology within English soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 813-826.
Windsor, P., Barker, J.B., & McCarthy, P.J. (2011). Doing sport psychology: Personal-disclosure mutual-sharing in professional soccer. The Sport Psychologist, 25, 94-114.